Philips objected — as amicus curiae — to a class-action settlement that sought to resolve claims filed against Philips for falsely advertising its Sonicare AirFloss as an easy replacement for floss when, in reality, the product — an oral irrigator — could not remove plaque between the teeth the same way that traditional floss could. To read more about that action, click here.


The Latest

Filters Wants More Teeth in Class-Action Settlement

Press Release Wants More Teeth in Class-Action Settlement

Philips Sonicare Airfloss Settlement Doesn’t Adequately Compensate Consumers MADISON, CT., Oct. 16, 2013 — ( has filed a legal brief taking aim at a recent class-action settlement that compensates…