Philips
TINA.org objected — as amicus curiae — to a class-action settlement that sought to resolve claims filed against Philips for falsely advertising its Sonicare AirFloss as an easy replacement for floss when, in reality, the product — an oral irrigator — could not remove plaque between the teeth the same way that traditional floss could. To read more about that action, click here.
Brands
The Latest
Sonicare Electric Toothbrushes
Unsupported claims to remove more plaque than a competitor’s e-toothbrush land product’s marketers in hot water.
TINA.org Wants More Teeth in Class-Action Settlement
Sonicare AirFloss settlement doesn’t adequately compensate consumers.
Reader Poll: Settlements Should Provide Cash
Coupons are not the preferred choice in false ad class actions.
TINA.org Wants More Teeth in Class-Action Settlement
Philips Sonicare Airfloss Settlement Doesn’t Adequately Compensate Consumers MADISON, CT., Oct. 16, 2013 — TINA.org (truthinadvertising.org) has filed a legal brief taking aim at a recent class-action settlement that compensates…
Class-Action Tracker
Avent Baby Bottles, Trainer Cups, and Sippy Cups
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “BPA FREE” and safe and suitable for babies and young children