Discounts at Ashley Furniture
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts from artificially inflated prices
In April 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ashley Furniture for allegedly deceptively marketing that its DuraBlend® upholstery used in some of its furniture – including sofas, loveseats, sectionals, and ottomans – is “blended leather” without adequately disclosing that the upholstery is not actually leather or providing the percentage of leather or non-leather materials in it, as required by law. (Razo et al v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc., Ashley Homestores, Ltd., and Does 1-100, Case No. 16-cv-2911, C. D. CA.)
For more information about other class-actions regarding leather products and TINA.org’s coverage of the products, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts from artificially inflated prices
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that furniture protection plans cover damages caused by accidents during normal use when the retailer denies claims for such reasons
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Ashley Furniture Industries and BD’s Furniture for allegedly misleadingly marketing furniture with the DuraBlend label as being durable blended leather when, according…
In November 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ashley Furniture for allegedly misleadingly advertising furniture – including sofas, loveseats, sectionals, and ottomans – with DuraBlend upholstery. According to the…
Class-action settlements that left consumers behind this year.
Price-match policy comes with a laundry list of limitations.