CATrends: Flea and Tick Products Marketed as Safe
Lawsuits allege products contain ingredients that are harmful to pets.
Information about federal false advertising class actions filed around the country. Please note, our list is neither comprehensive nor reflective of TINA.org’s opinion.
Lawsuits allege products contain ingredients that are harmful to pets.
Lawsuits allege that several brands contain microplastics despite being marketed as “natural spring water.”
Lawsuits take aim at so-called non-disparagement clauses.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that its single-serve plastic coffee pods are recyclable
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the company uses an ethical supply chain when at least one of its suppliers employs migrant child labor
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising products as safe, healthy, sustainable, and free of harmful chemicals when they contain chemicals that are harmful
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that cocoa has been harvested following ethical and environmentally responsible standards
Allegations: Falsely advertising that the airline is “carbon-neutral”
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that eggs come from chickens that are cage-free
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “recycling” bags that are “designed to handle all types of recyclables” and “[r]educe your environmental impact” when the bags are not recyclable at many facilities…
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as non-toxic
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as non-toxic
Allegations: Falsely marketing that the fur used in its clothing has been ethically and sustainably sourced in accordance with humane trapping standards