Rear-View Displays in Volvo Vehicles
Allegations: Marketing vehicles as safe when the rear-view camera display malfunctions and disappears
March 2020: An amended complaint adding two named plaintiffs was filed and the original named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed his claims When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
March 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Volvo for allegedly misleadingly marketing that a feature in XC90 vehicles called Sensus is compatible with Android Auto (an app that allows users to control and display apps from their smartphone in the car) when, according to the complaint, the cars are not compatible with the app. (Middien et al v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLC et al, Case No. 18-cv-3760, D.N.J.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Volvo and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Marketing vehicles as safe when the rear-view camera display malfunctions and disappears
Allegations: Marketing that the system provides a “user-friendly interface and unparalleled connectivity” when it freezes, reboots, crashes, and fails
Trying to take advantage of this sale may not be as smooth as advertised.
Cecilia D’Anastasio, Bloomberg
TINA.org digs into school’s debt-free claims.
Why agency independence is in the best interests of consumers.
What exactly does this running brand mean by “your return is on us”?