Volvo XC90
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing Volvo’s Sensus as compatible with the Android Auto app when it’s not
Volvo 850
March 2018: A federal judge granted the company’s motion to dismiss concluding, among other things, that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
May 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Volvo for advertising that its Volvo 850 had an innovative Side Impact Protection System (SIPS) with solid steel anti-intrusion doorbars on all four doors, when, according to the complaint, the SIPS did not exist in the rear doors. The class-action lawsuit was filed on behalf of those who have leased or owned the Volvo 850 produced in 1997. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint later in 2013.) (Webb et al. v. Volvo Cars of N.A., LLC et al., Case No. 13-cv-2394, E.D. Penn.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Volvo and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Sensus System in Volvo XC90s
Volvo XC90 T8
Volvo’s Sensus
The Latest
Google Has Made Millions Advertising Phony Government Handouts
Jesselyn Cook, The Huffington Post
The Accidental Typo on Purpose
How deceptive MLMers try to evade regulators in the COVID era.
Paparazzi Accessories Quietly Removes Lead and Nickel-Free Claim
Claim had appeared on an about page on jewelry MLM’s website.
Carvana
Whether buying a car online or in-person, consumers need to do their due diligence.
TINA.org Intercepts Super Bowl Advertisers’ Claims
It’s not just crypto ads consumers have to watch out for.