Vizzy Pineapple Mango Hard Seltzer

Case Name (Date)

Williams et al v. Molson Coors Beverage Co.
21-cv-50207, N.D. Ill.
(May 2021)

Product/Service

Allegations

Misleadingly marketing that one of the flavors in the beverage comes from mangos when the ingredients list does not include a mango ingredient

Misleadingly marketing that the beverage provides the same nutrients as mangos and pineapples when the ingredients list reveals the vitamin C comes from “dried acerola cherry juice”

Marketing the beverage in way that suggests alcoholic beverages are a way to get nutrients

Status

Settled
(Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.

https://www.vizzysettlement.com/

Class-Action Tracker

Vizzy Mimosa Hard Seltzers

Class Action

Vizzy Mimosa Hard Seltzers

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “Mimosa Hard Seltzer[s]” when they are actually beer

Vizzy Mimosa Hard Seltzer

Class Action

Vizzy Mimosa Hard Seltzer

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing drinks as “Mimosa Hard Seltzer”

Topo Chico Ranch Water

Class Action

Topo Chico Ranch Water

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as ranch water

Vizzy Hint of Watermelon Strawberry Hard Seltzer

Class Action

Vizzy Hint of Watermelon Strawberry Hard Seltzer

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the ingredients and nutrients in hard seltzer beverages

Vizzy Hard Seltzer

Class Action

Vizzy Hard Seltzer

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that alcohol products contain “Vitamin C Antioxidant from Acerola Superfruit” when the products contain a small amount of vitamin C that does not provide health benefits and…

Blue Moon Beer

Class Action

Blue Moon Beer

June 2016: After plaintiffs filed an amended complaint making similar allegations (i. e., the company misleadingly markets Blue Moon as a craft beer when it is not) in November 2015,…