The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Shelly et al. v. Proempire, LLC d/b/a Vitamatic
26-cv-1632, C.D. Cal.
(June 2026)
Vitamatic supplements
Misleadingly representing that one gummy, capsule, or tablet contains the advertised dosage when each one contains only a fraction of the advertised dosage
Pending
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?