
Smart Screen Lenses Draft
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are capable of preventing and minimizing digital eyestrain caused by long periods of screen time
August 2017: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement.
January 2017: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement resolving two false advertising class-action lawsuits against Visionworks:
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a full refund for a maximum award of $100 for each BOGO transaction. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for July 31, 2017.
June 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Visionworks of America for allegedly deceptively advertising that consumers who purchase one pair of eyeglasses get another pair free when, according to plaintiffs, the buy-one-get-one-free offer is continuously offered for a majority of the year and the ordinary price of the first pair of eyeglasses is increased making the second pair of eyeglasses not “truly free,” in violation of Illinois state law and FTC regulations. In September 2016, this action was transferred to a court in Ohio. (Lenart et al v. Visionworks of America, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-5935, N. D. OH.)
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are capable of preventing and minimizing digital eyestrain caused by long periods of screen time
Allegations: Misrepresenting that it secures consumers’ personal data when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in October 2024
Consumer complaints regarding alleged surprise charges are piling up.
Holy crop.
It’s not the first time the company has been accused of pulling a bait and switch.
Company makes marketing changes following TINA.org inquiry.
You might be surprised by who is actually eligible for USAA membership.