Verizon Monthly Rates
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates that do not include an “Administrative Charge”
November 2017: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
July 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Verizon New Jersey Inc. for allegedly misrepresenting that customers in New Jersey need to lease equipment – such as set-top boxes, digital adapters, and CableCARD devices – from Verizon for every television that will be used to access Verizon FiOS programming in the same household when, according to the complaint, customers may access FiOS on multiple televisions without leasing multiple pieces of equipment by using “technical equipment alternatives” (digital adapters, physical devices, and software programs that enable customers to access audio-visible content). The lawsuit was transferred to federal court in August 2017. (Struzynski et al v. Verizon New Jersey Inc. and Verizon Online LLC, Case No. 17-cv-6485, D. NJ.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Verizon and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates that do not include an “Administrative Charge”
Allegations: Falsely advertising monthly rates of wireless service plans
Allegations: Charging subscribers more than the advertised rate by adding an undisclosed fictitious fee to their monthly bills
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that Verizon is committed to protecting the environment and people when its cables are covered in toxic lead
In March 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Verizon Wireless alleging that its May 2019 Mother’s Day promotion was a bait-and-switch scheme. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the company falsely…
December 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties settled the matter. The terms of the settlement agreement have…
February 2016: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. (Hansell et al v. TracFone Wireless, Inc. dba Straight Talk Wireless et al, Case No.…
February 2016: The appeal was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. (Hansell et al v. TracFone Wireless, Inc. dba Straight Talk Wireless et al, Case No.…
These definitions are a joke.
When companies green it, they better mean it.
Some bad ads from this year.
Except when there’s battery damage.
Access to faster download speeds, among other touted features of Verizon 5G, may depend on where you are in the stadium.