There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In May 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against United Community Bank for allegedly misleadingly promising that it only charges overdraft fees on debit card transactions “when you do not have enough money in your account to cover a transaction” at the time the transaction occurs when, according to the plaintiffs, the bank charges overdraft fees on transactions that do not overdraw the account (i.e., there is enough money in the account to cover the transaction), as well as transactions that put an account into a negative balance days after the transaction when it settles. (Jones et al v. United Community Bank, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-190, E.D. Tenn.)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.