There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
June 2016: The action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.
February 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Nestlé Purina Petcare Company and Castor & Pollux Natural Petworks for allegedly misleadingly labeling Ultramix Grain Free & Poultry Free adult dog foods as “Made with Love IN THE USA” when, in reality, they contain ingredients from foreign countries. (Sensenig et al v. Merrick Pet Care d/b/a Castor and Pollux Natural Petworks, Nestlé USA, Inc., and Nestlé Purina Pet Care, Co., Case No. 16-cv-50022, N. D. IL.)
For more information about “made in the USA” and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
For more information about pets, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.