LegXercise Pro
Device maker does not have the clinical proof to back up its clinically proven claims.
U-Haul’s Fees
December 2014: This case was voluntarily dismissed after the Court ordered the plaintiffs to show why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
July 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against U-Haul International Co. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that U-Haul advertised a daily base rental fee which fails to inform consumers of a mandatory environmental fee that must also be paid as a condition of renting a U-Haul vehicle. (Arevalo et. al v. U-Haul International, Co. and DOES 1 through 10, Case No. 14-cv-01179, C.D. CA.).
For more information about other automotive-related class actions and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
Fighting Back Against Fake Reviews
TINA.org files comment in support of proposed rulemaking proceeding.
Crypto.com
Ad regulator bans Facebook ad for failing to disclose risks of investing in NFTs.
‘Clean at Sephora’ Label
Lawsuit alleges cosmetics marketed as ‘clean’ contain dirty ingredients.
Deceptive Ad Trends to Be Wary of in 2023
And the regulatory efforts that seek to curb them.