TINA.org Tells DOT: Don’t Muddy Airline Pricing
A proposed rule change could make it harder to know what you’ll actually pay for a flight.
December 2014: After this class-action lawsuit was transferred and consolidated with another lawsuit in Hawaii in December 2013, a federal judge granted final approval of a $6.1 million settlement of the claims. According to the settlement terms, class members may receive a cash refund or a voucher to purchase eligible products. The value of the refund or voucher will depend on several factors, including the number of Truvía® products purchased by the class members. The company also agreed to make changes to the product labels and website, including the addition of an explanation of the ingredients in the product.
September 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Cargill, Inc. for allegedly misleadingly labeling Truvía® Natural Sweetener. Among other things, the plaintiffs claim the company misrepresents the product as a natural sweetener primarily made from the stevia plant when, in reality, it contains both synthetic and chemically processed ingredients and only small amounts of Reb A (the stevia-derived ingredient). (Calderon et al v. Cargill, Inc. and Does 1-10, Case No. 13-cv-00685, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding Truvía and TINA’s coverage of the product, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Cargill and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
A proposed rule change could make it harder to know what you’ll actually pay for a flight.
Corporate bullies are weaponizing the legal system to silence the truth.
The hidden cost to these gift boxes.
Following lawsuit, Texas AG launches probe into energy drink’s “youth-oriented branding strategies.”
What you need to know about this shady e-commerce site.