Brainowl’s ‘Free’ IQ Test
“Free” offer could prove costly.
Trinty+ and Trinity Classic Facial Toning Devices and Wrinkle Reducer Attachments
Case Name (Date)
Chambers et al. v. Carol Cole Co., Inc. d/b/a NuFACE
24-cv-1938, S.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Product/Service
Trinity+ and Trinity Classic Facial Toning Devices and Wrinkle Reducer Attachments
Allegations
Falsely representing that the products’ red-light therapy provides several benefits – including increasing collagen production, correcting discoloration, and reducing inflammation, fine lines and wrinkles – when they are not capable of providing such benefits
Falsely representing that the products’ microcurrent technology is “clinically proven” to enhance collagen and elastin production, improve circulation, and tighten and tone skin when the devices are not capable of providing such benefits
Status
Pending
The Latest
Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
CATrends: Baseball Ticket Prices
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
Consumer Cellular
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.