The Most Deceptive Ads of 2025
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
Chambers et al. v. Carol Cole Co., Inc. d/b/a NuFACE
24-cv-1938, S.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Trinity+ and Trinity Classic Facial Toning Devices and Wrinkle Reducer Attachments
Falsely representing that the products’ red-light therapy provides several benefits – including increasing collagen production, correcting discoloration, and reducing inflammation, fine lines and wrinkles – when they are not capable of providing such benefits
Falsely representing that the products’ microcurrent technology is “clinically proven” to enhance collagen and elastin production, improve circulation, and tighten and tone skin when the devices are not capable of providing such benefits
Pending
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
Watch out for this company’s sketchy sale.
It’s not you Thomas, it’s Pixel’s 100x zoom, actually.
Some class-action settlements that left consumers out in the cold.
Don’t let this post-trip extension take you for a bumpy ride.