Influencers’ quiet disclosures lagged behind LVCVA’s loud promotion of Formula One race
Kyle Chouinard, Las Vegas Sun
In August 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Smitty’s Supply and Tractor Supply Co. for allegedly misleadingly marketing tractor hydraulic fluids as providing anti-wear and protective benefits when, according to plaintiffs, the fluids do not provide the promised benefits. In addition, the complaint claims that the company represents that the fluids meet certain manufacturer specification and the “303” specifications when, according to plaintiffs the fluids do not meet all of the listed manufacturer specifications and the “303” designation is obsolete. (Buford et al v. Smitty’s Supply, Inc. and Tractor Supply Company, Case No. 19-cv-82, E.D. Ark.)
For more information about the marketing of tractor hydraulic fluids, click here.
Kyle Chouinard, Las Vegas Sun
Regulatory activity following TINA.org’s 2022 complaint.
Clear policy or moving target?
Is your Social Security number as vulnerable as this company claims?
Lawsuit alleges the McRib is a McScam.