$5 jewelry and an MLM conference gone wrong
Emily Stewart, Vox
In August 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Smitty’s Supply and Tractor Supply Co. for allegedly misleadingly marketing tractor hydraulic fluids as providing anti-wear and protective benefits when, according to plaintiffs, the fluids do not provide the promised benefits. In addition, the complaint claims that the company represents that the fluids meet certain manufacturer specification and the “303” specifications when, according to plaintiffs the fluids do not meet all of the listed manufacturer specifications and the “303” designation is obsolete. (Buford et al v. Smitty’s Supply, Inc. and Tractor Supply Company, Case No. 19-cv-82, E.D. Ark.)
For more information about the marketing of tractor hydraulic fluids, click here.
Emily Stewart, Vox
TINA.org breaks down the legal issues of marketing a “hangover supplement.”
Car wrap scam has plenty of gas left in the tank.
TINA.org files a complaint with federal regulators over shoemaker’s deceptive made in the USA claims.
The Fashion Law