There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Rahmani et al. v. Thrillzz Inc.
25-cv-2548, S.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2025)
Thrillzz Sweepstakes Sportsbook
Falsely marketing itself as a legal form of gambling in California when it is not
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.