JetBlue’s ‘Flight Disruptions’ Refund Policy
Clear policy or moving target?
In October 2016, a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Tempur Sealy International was stayed after plaintiffs filed for permission to appeal the Court’s decision to deny class certification. The complaint, which was originally filed in 2013 and amended in 2015, alleges that the company misleadingly markets its Tempur-Pedic mattresses and pillows as, among other things, “safe and healthy” without disclosing that the products contain harmful chemicals and consumers who used them experienced adverse health effects, including severe allergic reactions and sinus issues. (Todd et al v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc. f/k/a Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. and Tempur-Pedic North America, LLC, Case No. 13-cv-4984, N. D. CA.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding sleep products and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Clear policy or moving target?
Is your Social Security number as vulnerable as this company claims?
Lawsuit alleges the McRib is a McScam.
A closer look at what we’ll be monitoring in the new year.
The problem hasn’t gone away.