What You Should Know about Used Cars and Open Recalls
It may surprise you.
January 2022: The appellate court affirmed the district court’s decision. (Case No. 20-3831, 2nd Cir.)
November 2020: Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the dismissal order.
October 2020: The Court adopted the Report and Recommendation and dismissed the case.
September 2020: The magistrate judge recommended that the Court grant the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
June 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-736, W.D.N.Y.)
April 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Wall & Associates for allegedly falsely advertising its tax relief services by deceiving consumers about the location of its offices and misrepresenting the cost and duration of its services, as well as the experience and qualifications of its employees. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that:
(Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in May 2020.) (Vandermast et al v. Wall & Associates, Inc., Case No. E168480/2019, New York State Court – Niagara)
It may surprise you.
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.