On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
June 2016: Sunoco filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the order denying its Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Litigation.
May 2016: A federal judge denied Sunoco’s motion to compel arbitration and stay litigation. To learn more about the judge’s reasoning, click here.
August 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sunoco for allegedly falsely advertising that Sunoco Rewards Credit Card cardholders will receive a 5¢ per gallon discount on every fuel transaction at a Sunoco location when, in reality, such claims are not true. (White et al v. Sunoco Inc., Case No. 15-cv-4595, E. D. PA.)
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
Every now and then you overthink.
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.