There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In July 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Sun-Maid Growers of California alleging that the “No Sugar Added” claims for Sun-Maid® Natural California Raisins and Sun-Maid® California Golden Raisins violate federal regulations (which state that that “no sugar added” labels may only be used if food normally contains added sugars) because the raisins do not normally contain added sugar. (Saghian et al v. Sun-Maid Growers of California, Case No. 17-cv-5013, C. D. CA.)
For more information about sugar claims, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.