Wood-N-Tap
Getting hangry over a hidden delivery fee.
Sue Bee and Aunt Sue’s Honey Products
July 2020: Summary judgment was entered in favor of Sioux Honey Association Cooperative.
April 2018: This stay of this case was lifted.
October 2017: This case was stayed pending the FDA’s decision regarding the proper use of the word “natural.”
January 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sioux Honey Association Cooperative for allegedly deceptively marketing Sue Bee and Aunt Sue’s honey products as pure and natural when, in reality, they contain a synthetic chemical ingredient, glyphosate. (Tran et al v. Sioux Honey Association Cooperative, Case No. 17-cv-110, C.D. Cal.)
For more information about natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
CATrends: Deceptive ‘Plant-Based’ Claims
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
TINA.org Joins Over 300 Orgs. in Letter Urging Congress to Support Financial Watchdog
Legislators should protect the work of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Happy Howl Dog Food
What does “human-grade” dog food actually mean?
Plaintiffs Awarded $2.3 Million for Bigelow Made in USA Claim Steeped in Deception
The statement, “Manufactured in the USA 100%,” had appeared on product packaging.