Magic Styler’s Refund Policy
This risk-free trial might have you pulling your hair out.
Sue Bee and Aunt Sue’s Honey Products
July 2020: Summary judgment was entered in favor of Sioux Honey Association Cooperative.
April 2018: This stay of this case was lifted.
October 2017: This case was stayed pending the FDA’s decision regarding the proper use of the word “natural.”
January 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sioux Honey Association Cooperative for allegedly deceptively marketing Sue Bee and Aunt Sue’s honey products as pure and natural when, in reality, they contain a synthetic chemical ingredient, glyphosate. (Tran et al v. Sioux Honey Association Cooperative, Case No. 17-cv-110, C.D. Cal.)
For more information about natural claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
FTC Proposes New Rule Targeting Deceptive Income Claims in MLM Industry
Proposed new earnings claim rule comes three years after TINA.org comment to FTC.
Period Stigma and the Deceptive Marketing of Menstrual Products
How negative feelings surrounding menstruation have influenced period product marketing.
Carlyle’s Saw Palmetto & Other Supplements
Why these products may leave you wanting more.
CATrends: Products Marketed as Containing No Preservatives
Class-action lawsuits target preservative-free claims.