CATrends: Hypoallergenic Marketing Claims
A rash of lawsuits allege companies are misleading consumers.
July 2018: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for November 8, 2018.
May 2018: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement in which class members may receive either a credit to use towards subscriptions to Rivals.com or a cash payment. Class members who signed up for annual subscriptions may receive five months of credits or $20 in cash, and class members who signed up for monthly subscriptions may receive three months of credit or $10 in cash. In addition, the website agreed to change the subscription page to more adequately disclose the automatic renewal terms.
May 2017: The case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 17-cv-2745, N.D. Cal.)
March 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against the college sports website Rivals.com for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers and cancellation policy for its monthly and annual subscriptions for access to “premium” content and message boards resulting in subscribers being charged without their consent. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in May 2018.) (Wahl et al v. Yahoo! Inc. dba Rivals.com, Case No. 17-cv-308083, California Superior Court – Santa Clara)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of negative option offers, click here.
A rash of lawsuits allege companies are misleading consumers.
The Halloween ‘haunt’ that isn’t.
Lawsuit accuses company of duping consumers into buying “unwanted” golf balls.
Will you really make thousands of dollars a month as a home baker?
Unboxing this meal kit company’s enticing offer.