Perimenopause is the new buzzword in the business of women’s health
Sarah Todd, Stat News
July 2018: A federal judge preliminarily approved the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for November 8, 2018.
May 2018: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement in which class members may receive either a credit to use towards subscriptions to Rivals.com or a cash payment. Class members who signed up for annual subscriptions may receive five months of credits or $20 in cash, and class members who signed up for monthly subscriptions may receive three months of credit or $10 in cash. In addition, the website agreed to change the subscription page to more adequately disclose the automatic renewal terms.
May 2017: The case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 17-cv-2745, N.D. Cal.)
March 2017: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against the college sports website Rivals.com for allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of its automatic renewal and continuous service offers and cancellation policy for its monthly and annual subscriptions for access to “premium” content and message boards resulting in subscribers being charged without their consent. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in May 2018.) (Wahl et al v. Yahoo! Inc. dba Rivals.com, Case No. 17-cv-308083, California Superior Court – Santa Clara)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of negative option offers, click here.
Sarah Todd, Stat News
TINA.org finds more of the same – and then some – from retail giant.
FTC lawsuit alleged company duped consumers into signing up and then made it hard to cancel.
Your best defense against deceptive AI? A little research.
The surprising way you may be paying more for delivery.