Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Subscriptions to Cerebral
Case Name (Date)
Debono et al. v. Cerebral, Inc.
22-cv-3378, N.D. Cal.
(June 2022)
Product/Service
Subscriptions to Cerebral
(a telemedicine company that provides access to therapy, counseling, and medication)
Allegations
Failing to disclose that subscribers’ access to various mental health services is contingent on the availability of counselors, therapists, and prescribers in their geographic area
Misleadingly marketing that subscribers can cancel subscriptions anytime when the company makes it difficult to cancel subscriptions
Status
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
The Latest
CATrends: Baseball Ticket Prices
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
Consumer Cellular
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.