Spirit Airlines Shortcut Boarding

Case Name (Date)

Pochiro et al. v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.
21-cv-61343, S.D. Fla.
(June 2021)

Product/Service

Allegations

Deceptively marketing that passengers who upgrade their flight get priority boarding when they weren’t allowed to board early during the COVID-19 pandemic due to state and federal health regulations

Status

Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.

Class-Action Tracker

Spirit Airlines Prices

Class Action

Spirit Airlines Prices

Allegations: Misleadingly representing that it is a “low-cost, low-fare airline” offering affordable travel

Spirit’s “Shortcut Security”

Class Action

Spirit’s “Shortcut Security”

Allegations: Misleadingly advertising that consumers who purchase the “Shortcut Security” option can use a separate, faster line to get through security at certain airports

Spirit Airlines “Shortcut Security”

Class Action

Spirit Airlines “Shortcut Security”

Allegations: Deceptively advertising a “Shortcut Security” option that allows consumers who pay for this option to use a separate, faster line to get through security at certain U.S. airports