SeaWorld’s All-Day Dining Deal
Allegations: Marketing materials represent that certain restaurants participate in the dining deal when they don’t
April 2019: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
June 2018: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to its terms, class members may receive a pro rata share of an $11,500,000 settlement fund after attorneys’ fees and service awards are paid. The amount class members receive will be based on the number of passes they purchased. The agreement does not provide any injunctive relief. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for April 18, 2019.
2014: A class-action lawsuit regarding Seaworld’s EZ Pay plan was filed. The complaint, which was later amended in 2015, alleges, among other things, that Seaworld automatically renews consumers’ EZ Pay plan (which allows consumers to pay for park passes in twelve monthly installments) even though the contract says Seaworld is not authorized to do so. (Herman et al v. Seaworld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-3028, M. D. FL.)
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Seaworld and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about negative option offers, click here.
Allegations: Marketing materials represent that certain restaurants participate in the dining deal when they don’t
Allegations: Misleadingly hiding the mistreatment of its killer whales and the detrimental impact captivity has on them
A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against SeaWorld for allegedly misleading the public about its care for captive orcas and hiding the detrimental effects captivity has on them. Specifically,…
When companies green it, they better mean it.