There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In March 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Scott Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that it assesses overdraft non-sufficient funds fees based on the amount of money in an account when, according to plaintiffs, such fees are assessed based on an amount that deducts holds placed on deposits and pending debit card transactions. (Toth et al v. Scott Credit Union, Case No. 20-cv-306, S.D. Ill.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.