Saks Fifth Avenue and Saks Off Fifth
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices and as available for a limited time
In December 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Saks for allegedly misleadingly advertising discounts of merchandise. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the store compares “sale” prices to false “market” prices when, according to plaintiffs, the “market” prices were “artificially inflated,” were never the original prices for the merchandise, and were not the prevailing market retail prices within the three months immediately before the advertisement, as required by California law. (Nunez et al v. Saks Incorporated and Does 1-50, Case No. 15-cv-2717, S. D. CA.)
For more information about the deceptive advertising of discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices and as available for a limited time
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as luxurious and high quality when they tarnish and discolor due to a defect
December 2018: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 18-cv-10594, C.D. Cal.) November 2018: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Saks Off Fifth for allegedly deceptively…
February 2015: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal…
Hoping to score fabulous designer goods at Saks Fifth Avenue’s “Friends & Family” sale this week? The website prominently displays the discount—25% off. But don’t forget to read the fine…
Neiman Marcus, others settle with FTC after marketing rabbit, raccoon, and other real fur as fakes.