June 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed because the parties settled. The named plaintiff’s claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. and the class members’ claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The terms of the settlement have not been disclosed.

September 2014: A federal judge allowed some of the false advertising claims originally filed against Rockhard Laboratories in October 2013 to move forward. Among other things, the remaining claims allege that the company misleadingly labels Rockhard Weekend as:

  • A “sexual performance enhancer for men” that provides “Fast & Effective” “Rockhard Results” when, in reality, the ingredients do not enhance male sexual performance;
  • An “all natural” product when it actually contains synthetic and chemically reduced ingredients; and
  • “Doctor Tested, Doctor Approved” without any evidence to support such claims.

To learn more about the dismissed and continuing claims, click here. (Dorsey et al v. Rockhard Laboratories, LLC and Rockhard Laboratories Holdings LLC, Case No. 13-cv-7557, C. D. CA.).

For more information about supplements, click here.

 


The Latest

Filters

TINA.org Notifies Celebrities Promoting NFTs

Press Release

TINA.org Notifies Celebrities Promoting NFTs

MADISON, CONN. August 9, 2022 — An increasing number of celebrities are jumping on the NFT bandwagon, showcasing their digital assets on social media for the world to see. But are…


Show More