Roblox
TINA.org found metaverse gaming platform rife with deceptive marketing.
A.B. et al. v. Roblox Corp.
21-cv-5683, N.D. Cal.
(July 2021)
Doe et al. v. Roblox Corp.
21-cv-3943, N.D. Cal.
(May 2021)
Virtual items on Roblox
Advertising in-game content without warning consumers that the platform deletes purchased content and does not provide refunds or credits for the deletions
A.B. case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Doe case: Settled
(Final approval granted)
TINA.org found metaverse gaming platform rife with deceptive marketing.
Allegations: Falsely representing that Roblox is safe and educational and that users can make money on the platform
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that Roblox is free to play and failing to provide refunds to minors
Allegations: Failing to disclose the risk of criminal and predative activity on its platform and misleading parents into thinking that Roblox protects children from inappropriate content
Allegations: Falsely representing that its platform and digital currency are safe and that experiences that simulate gambling are not allowed on the platform
TINA.org submits comment in support of FTC’s proposal to ban fake celebrity endorsements, romance scams and other impersonation scams.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
Five deceptive ad trends to be wary of this year.
Class-action settlements that left consumers behind this year.
Asa Hiken, Adage