Ring Video Doorbells and Security Cameras
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose that in order to have access to certain key features of the Ring video doorbells and security cameras consumers need to purchase a Ring Basic…
January 2021: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 21-cv-544, N.D. Cal.)
November 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Ring LLC for allegedly failing to adequately disclose in its advertising of the Ring Basic Protect Plan that consumers need to pay an additional $3 per month or $30 per year for each device in order to get certain key features that are not otherwise available, including video recording, playback and snapshot. (Jack et al v. Ring LLC, Case No. CGC-20-588258, California State Court – San Francisco)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Ring home security devices, click here.
Allegations: Failing to adequately disclose that in order to have access to certain key features of the Ring video doorbells and security cameras consumers need to purchase a Ring Basic…
Allegations: Marketing that products will help protect homes and that the company safeguards consumers’ private information when hackers have used the security systems to spy on and harass people who…
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the doorbell’s battery lasts between 6 and 12 months when the battery actually lasts less than 2 months
Advertised $19.99 price deserves an official review.
When the sale price is the regular price.
Your next adventure begins with this briefing.
Software maker will pay a $75 million fine and provide “affected consumers” with free services.
Order puts platforms like Amazon and Walmart on notice.