Ring’s Basic Protect Plan

January 2021: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 21-cv-544, N.D. Cal.)

November 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Ring LLC for allegedly failing to adequately disclose in its advertising of the Ring Basic Protect Plan that consumers need to pay an additional $3 per month or $30 per year for each device in order to get certain key features that are not otherwise available, including video recording, playback and snapshot. (Jack et al v. Ring LLC, Case No. CGC-20-588258, California State Court – San Francisco)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of Ring home security devices, click here.

Class-Action Tracker

Ring Video Doorbells Sold on Amazon.com

Class Action

Ring Video Doorbells Sold on Amazon.com

Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that the doorbell’s battery lasts between 6 and 12 months when the battery actually lasts less than 2 months

Ring Security System

Class Action

Ring Security System

Allegations: Misleadingly representing that the company safeguards users’ private information when it does not take adequate steps to stop hackers and actively shares users’ personal data without consent

Ring Video Doorbells and Security Cameras

Class Action

Ring Video Doorbells and Security Cameras

In April 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Ring LLC for allegedly failing to adequately disclose that the only way for consumers to get certain key features of the…

Ring’s Home Security Devices

Class Action

Ring’s Home Security Devices

Between December 2019 and January 2020, multiple class-action lawsuits were filed against Ring LLC for allegedly promising consumers that its home security devices will help them protect their homes and…