Homeaglow’s $19 house cleaning service traps customers in hard-to-cancel subscriptions, watchdog group says
Stephanie Zimmermann, Chicago Sun Times
RevitaLash
Case Name (Date)
Rush et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
23-cv-8799, E.D.N.Y.
(Nov. 2023)
Product/Service
RevitaLash Advanced and RevitaBrow Advanced products
Allegations
Falsely marketing that products safely improve and enhance the appearance of eyebrows and eyelashes without disclosing that they contain an active ingredient (dechloro dihdroxy difluoro ethylcloprostenolamide, or DDDE) that is not safe to use near the eyes
Status
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
The Latest
RushMyPassport
Does this passport service live up to its name?
CATrends: Hypoallergenic Marketing Claims
A rash of lawsuits allege companies are misleading consumers.
Ghost Girls
The Halloween ‘haunt’ that isn’t.
Titleist Golf Balls
Lawsuit accuses company of duping consumers into buying “unwanted” golf balls.