Nike: Rip The Script
It was all going to plan until footballer’s instincts took over.
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Case Name (Date)
Rush et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
24-cv-8542, C.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Slattery et al. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.
23-cv-10078, C.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2023)
Product/Service
RevitaLash and RevitaBrow
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing products as serums that are safe to use to improve the appearance of eyelashes and eyebrows without warning of the serious side effects and risks associated with using one of the ingredients in them (dihdroxy difluoro ethylcloprostenolamide, or DDDE) near the eyes
Status
Rush case: Consolidated with Slattery v. Athena Cosmetics
Slattery case: Pending
The Latest
Did Timothée Chalamet Just Take a Dig at Deceptive Marketing?
Why I’m a fan of this Adidas World Cup ad.
‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com