
CATrends: Packed in ‘100% Fruit Juice’
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
In April 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the owners of Revel Casino for allegedly deceptively advertising that the casino would refund all losses on slot machines during the month of July 2013 when, in reality, consumers did not receive cash refunds and only received “free slot play coupons” with many restrictions. (Stern et al v. Revel AC, Inc., Revel AC, LLC, Revel Entertainment Group, LLC, and Chatham Asset Management, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-02056, D. NJ.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Revel Casino and TINA.org’s coverage of the casino, click here.
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Be wary of these life-changing claims.
TINA.org reader receives a suspicious email.