Fixing the Subscription Trap
The FTC’s Negative Option Rule do-over – and what’s at stake.
In April 2014, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the owners of Revel Casino for allegedly deceptively advertising that the casino would refund all losses on slot machines during the month of July 2013 when, in reality, consumers did not receive cash refunds and only received “free slot play coupons” with many restrictions. (Stern et al v. Revel AC, Inc., Revel AC, LLC, Revel Entertainment Group, LLC, and Chatham Asset Management, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-02056, D. NJ.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Revel Casino and TINA.org’s coverage of the casino, click here.
The FTC’s Negative Option Rule do-over – and what’s at stake.
Be wary of questionable and deceptive claims in origin stories.
Mounting lawsuits accuse Meta of breaking privacy promises.
Breaking down the fine print of this March Madness commercial.
Advertised $19.99 price deserves an official review.