In January 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Rust-Oleum for allegedly misleadingly marketing Restore products – including 2X One Coat Solid Stain and 4X Deck Coat – as being thicker than ordinary paint and providing superior protection when, according to plaintiffs, the products cannot withstand harsh weather, are not superior, and prematurely crack, peel, bubble, flake, and chip. In addition, the plaintiffs claim that company misleadingly represents that Restore 2X is effective after applying only one coat to a deck’s surface when, according to the complaint, certain protections in the product only work if two coats are applied. (Garrard et al v. Rust-Oleum Corp., Case No. 20-cv-612, N. D. Ill.)

For more of TINA.org’s coverage of lawsuits filed against Rust-Oleum, click here.


Class-Action Tracker

Watco Tung Oil

Class Action

Watco Tung Oil

Allegations: Falsely marketing products as tung oil when tung oil is not the primary ingredient

RainBrella

Class Action

RainBrella

Allegations: Falsely marketing that the glass treatment “Lasts Over 100 Car Washes” and “Lasts 2X Longer*”

Restore Products for Wood Surfaces

Class Action

Restore Products for Wood Surfaces

In October 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Rust-Oleum Corp. for allegedly misleadingly advertising Restore products for wood surfaces, including Restore Deck Start Wood Primer, Restore 2X, and Restore…

Rust-Oleum Spray Paints

Class Action

Rust-Oleum Spray Paints

September 2017: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement. May 2017: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement of a false advertising class-action lawsuit against Rust-Oleum…

Rust-Oleum’s “Restore” Products

Class Action

Rust-Oleum’s “Restore” Products

In April 2015, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Rust-Oleum for allegedly deceptively marketing “Restore” products for wooden decks, including Deck & Concrete Restore and Deck & Concrete Restore 10x.…


The Latest

Filters