Rawlings Power Balance Performance Bracelet
April 2014: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
October 2013: A federal judge preliminarily approved a settlement to a class-action lawsuit alleging that Rawlings Sporting Goods falsely advertises its Power Balance Performance Bracelet. The complaint, originally filed in 2012, alleges that company represents that the Performance Bracelet will provide consumers with increased energy when, according to plaintiffs, it is actually just a rubber band that does not provide consumers with any increased energy at all or with any health benefits. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase who return the bracelet will receive a full refund plus shipping costs (of $2 per bracelet). In addition, the company agreed to stop making false claims in advertisements for the bracelet. The final fairness hearing is scheduled for April 7, 2014. (Steiner et al v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co., Inc. and Does 1-10, Case No. 12-cv-02531, D.N.J.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Rawlings Sporting Goods and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Rawlings Power Balance Performance Bracelet
The Latest
Did Timothée Chalamet Just Take a Dig at Deceptive Marketing?
Why I’m a fan of this Adidas World Cup ad.
‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com
Airport Retailers Can Now Charge an Employee Benefits Fee—but It May Not Go to Workers
Georgia Fearn, Inc.com