There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In June 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Rabobank for allegedly failing to adequately disclose that the bank charges customers who overdraw their accounts a daily Continued Overdraft Fee of $5, in addition to the initial $35 Overdraft Fee. According to the complaint, the bank charges the Continued Overdraft Fee every day that an account remains overdrawn for up to ten days. (Villanueva et al v. Rabaobank, N.A., Case No. 2018-00028998, Superior Court of California – County of San Diego)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.