There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In June 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Corelle for allegedly failing to disclose that it began making Pyrex glassware with a different type of glass than it used to use and that the new glass is more prone to cracking, breaking, shattering, and exploding when exposed to extreme temperature changes. Specifically, the complaint claims that, before 1998, the company used borosilicate glass, which is resistant to extreme changes in temperature, to make the glassware and then, in 1998, the company switched to soda lime silicate glass, which is only resistant to much smaller changes in temperature. (Fullerton et al v. Corelle Brands, LLC et al, Case NO. 18-cv-4152, N.D. Ill.)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.