
Neutrogena Makeup Remover Cleansing Towelettes
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as plant based
November 2017: This consolidated action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
October 2017: This case was consolidated with another similar case filed against Neutrogena for its marketing of Pure & Free®, Hernandez v. Johnson & Johnson.
2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Neutrogena for allegedly falsely advertising Pure & Free® sunscreens as being 100% natural when, according to plaintiffs, the sunscreens contain unnatural and synthetic ingredients. The complaint was originally filed in July and amended in September. (Fagan et al v. Neutrogena Corp., Case No. 13-cv-1316, C. D. CA.)
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as plant based
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “Preservative-Free”
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Failing to disclose that products contain high levels of the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Falsely advertising sunscreens as waterproof
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzophenone
Allegations: Failing to disclose products contain the carcinogen benzophenone
Allegations: Failing to disclose sunscreens contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Failing to disclose sunscreens contain the carcinogen benzene
Allegations: Failing to disclose sunscreens contain the carcinogen benzene
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
Class-action lawsuits target preservative-free claims.
Some class-action settlements that left consumers behind.
TINA.org has tracked more than 150 lawsuits alleging greenwashing.
Lawsuits allege labeling fails to disclose sunscreen products contain carcinogen.