
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Davis et al. v. The Pur Copany (USA), Inc.
22-cv-6430, W.D.N.Y.
(Oct. 2022)
Pür peppermint gum
Falsely marketing gum as peppermint when the ingredients list shows it contains no peppermint ingredients and the flavor comes from unspecified “natural flavors”
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.