There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In March 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Puff Corp. (a company that manufactures and markets vaporizers for cannabis concentrates and other smoking materials) for allegedly misleadingly representing that its PUFFCO PEAK vaporizers are reliable when, according to plaintiffs, the batteries do not charge properly and the atomizers do not heat properly due to defects. (Anderson et al v. Puff Corp., Case No. 19-cv-2126, D. AZ.)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.