There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Drugas et al. v. Prime Hydration LLC
23-cv-8552, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2023)
Preudhomme et al. v. Prime Hydration, LLC
24-cv-3568, S.D.N.Y.
(May 2024)
In Re: Prime Energy Consumer Litigation
24-cv-2657, S.D.N.Y.
(April 2024)
PRIME Energy drinks
Drinks contain more caffeine than advertised
Drugas case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Preudhomme case: Consolidated with Vera case as In Re: Prime Energy Consumer Litigation
In Re: Prime Energy Consumer Litigation: Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.