There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
John et al. v. Am Retail Group, Inc. et al.
17-cv-727, S.D. Cal.
(April 2017)
Wilson’s Leather men’s and women’s outerwear and accessories
Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated prices
Settled and voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.