Arrowhead Bottled Water
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “100% Mountain Spring Water” when they contain microplastics
Moore et al. v. BlueTriton Brands, Inc.
24-cv-1640, E.D.N.Y.
(March 2024)
Poland Spring bottled waters
Falsely marketing products as “100% Natural Spring Water” when they contain microplastics and phthalates (a synthetic chemical)
Pending
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as “100% Mountain Spring Water” when they contain microplastics
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing products as “100% Natural Spring Water” when they contain microplastics
Allegations: False “100% Recyclable” claims
Allegations: False “100% Recyclable” claims
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing sparkling waters as being flavored “with a twist of raspberry lime” without adequately disclosing that the waters contain “Natural Flavors”
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the water as flavored with lemon when the ingredients list reveals it contains “natural flavors” instead of a lemon ingredient
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the water as flavored with lemon when the ingredients list reveals it contains “Natural Flavors” instead of a lemon ingredient
March 2019: A federal judge dismissed the claims brought under Vermont law but allowed the other claims to move forward. June 2018: Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint…
Lawsuits allege that several brands contain microplastics despite being marketed as “natural spring water.”
TINA.org has tracked more than 100 lawsuits alleging greenwashing.
See how you stack up.
When companies green it, they better mean it.
See how you stack up.