Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
In October 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Philadelphia Federal Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that the credit union charges only one insufficient funds fee on a single transaction when, according to the complaint, the credit union charges a fee every time that a rejected transaction is reprocessed for payment resulting in multiple fees on a single transaction. (Dailey et al v. Philadelphia Federal Credit Union, Case No. 191002749, Pennsylvania State Court – Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County)
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
FTC alleges company pressures consumers into overpaying for its tax filing software.